The election cycle has debased to fearmongering between the binary political machines: A particular strain of the political corridors is peddling immoral fitness against their adversary, and the other aisle is pulpiteering economic unsophistication against their foe.

The kernel of truth—the political left’s moralizing of their adversary does not ring as a death-knell, as the political right’s selection criteria for a candidate, is not premised on moral conscientiousness, i.e., in their purview, the ballot box does not invoke for a minister-in-chief or a moral philosopher-in-chief; rather, the GOP is exercising their vote on the prism of a commander in chief, who can salvage the economy from its inflated woes, i.e., gas prices, provisions, housing, etc.

Tony Hinchcliffe’s comedic soliloquy, likening Puerto Rico to a pile of chaff, was unmitigatedly scarce of civil decorum, but his umbrage-fused monologue did not turn the tide in abating the political right’s voting bloc, to precipitate an in-group exodus toward the camp of its political foes.

The aforementioned is a telling denotation—the political left’s swiftness in touting the GOP’s moral incivility is not a robust proselytizing mechanism, as their voting bloc regards moral conscientiousness, as a subordinate posture, in juxtapose to the holy grail polities of deregulation, tax reduction, energy independence, etc.

The needle that needs threading from the political left, is messaging that will spawn an economic renaissance for all Americans, that cannot get gestated from its political antagonists.