A countercultural political thespian, in juxtaposition to an orthodox political binary political machine, should not be pegged as a menacing saddle, if that conventional political mainline fraternity, is actively seeded in serving the interests of its voting bloc.
Dr. Jill Stein’s (independent candidate) aura, may be clouded with a Saviorism complex (as she is definitively a populist)—but the fortitude of her political might nestles in her prism of being demos-centered, sans the affixment, to the hamstrung potency of the corporate purse.
A myriad of Steins’ polities, i.e., universal health care, reparations, anti-war politics, etc., are utopian theoretically (and a potential disincentive toward personal stewardship) but conceivable pragmatically (with adjustments), if mined through the dexterous constitutional (and policymaking) utilities of referendums, executive power, etc. (The aforementioned constitutional utilities, are being conveyed broadly.)
The executive office wields substantive power to pass executive orders (through transient—but a starting juncture) sans the processes of bicameralism, as long as the order is in lockstep with the ethos of the law.
Article II of the Constitution explicitly accentuates, the president can pass executive orders if that order is in alignment to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
The sentiment of a vote for a third party being an exercise in chaff is a toxic political modus operandi, and an umbrage to the tenor of the rule of democracy; In a democratic dispensation, a vote must be earned without the exercise of deceptive half-baked political truths—political strategems must not be entangled with democratic precepts.
The power of a political existential vision—if merited of proselytization—is found in its efficacy, in ameliorating the quality of life for its citizenry.
The political messaging by mainline political guilds that discounts alternative candidates under the misnomer of political dilution and political pillaging (i.e., the thieving of votes from the conventional political party), is a marred misrepresentation: The misnomer lapses in discerning that a copious amount of third party voter turnouts are either individuals who are not adherents to the binary political machine, or persons who have previously identified as apolitical.
Dr Stein’s political vision may have its defects, i.e., taxation maladies, personal stewardship, etc., but her polities, should not be fashioned as null and void; while her polities could ignite retaliation if in office, de-platforming an alternative presidential aspirant, or smearing their campaign—due to their perceived predisposition of pillaging of votes from an orthodox political guild—is undemocratic.
