A presidential candidate is not above reproach and one’s partiality must not be destitute of in-group scrutiny if concrete gains, are to be yielded.

A public official’s ontological and existential social location is subordinate (contentiously) to one’s manifesto—but cardinal in the metanarrative of an election campaign and subsequent dispensation tenure if elected.

Identity is a cachet into the unconscious, subconscious, and conscious posture one undertakes on policy concoction.

The public discourse and fixation from certain quarters on Kamala’s contentious chameleon social location could conceivable be a malicious impeachment, and simultaneously, a deconstruction devoid of ill will from certain sects.

Public upbraiding from taxpayers when weighed constructively, could be a net positive actualization for a candidate, to furnish unadulterated clarity, to issues that are paradoxical to a favorable voting bloc.